Tuesday, 29 January 2019

Results Trump Democracy, ECan's Big Picture -- January 2019


Nearly nine years ago now the National Government sacked the Environment Canterbury (ECan) councillors and replaced them with two commissioners: Margaret Bazely and David Caygill.

There was much wailing and gnashing of teeth about the death of democracy, but that seemed to me to largely depend on whether you voted Blue, Red or Green. Governments replace democratically elected boards, namely school boards, with commissioners all the time and barely an eyebrow is raised. The focus in that instance isn’t democracy, it’s on achieving what’s best for the school and the students, and likewise the focus on Ecan being run by commissioners should be “has the region and the environment been served better for that decision?”.

We farmers are smack bang in the middle of being held to account for our impact on the environment, and largely we have been poorly served by our regional councils. At least one is embroiled in a court case to determine whether they can proceed with their proposed method of determining nitrogen losses, and another has signalled that it will plough ahead with their plans despite the likelihood of a similar costly battle.

All of this is happening too late, David Parker had been signalling for a very long time in Opposition that regional councils had dropped the ball and needed to pick up their game. They had the power to effect and enforce change and were not doing it, so now they’re going to get a National Policy Statement that clearly sets out what the government expects of them. The Minister of The Environment is not happy with regional councils, with the exception of one.

Prior to the election I had the opportunity to ask the Minister a couple of questions around the water tax that was being mooted. I asked him if he was concerned that such a tax would drive marginal cropping farms to convert to dairying in order to get the best return from their irrigation. He replied that no, he was not concerned at all. He had faith that ECan had robust processes in place to ensure land use changes had minimal environmental impact. In that meeting the Minister was effusive in his praise for ECan, going so far as to say he believed the National government had done the right thing in installing commissioners. Canterbury, he said, had nothing to fear from a change in government.

It has taken ECan a good six years to get us into this position, making unpopular decisions and forging ahead with a big picture in mind. I’ll admit that I’m a farmer who grumbled every step of the way. Why did I need a nutrient budget? A Farm Environment Plan? Why for the love of my bottom line am I paying a consultant $10,000 to secure consent to farm?

All this became clear last November when I finally had my farm audited. My auditor, Megan Hands from LandSavvy, made it clear she was setting a baseline from which I was expected to improve. It might not sound like much, but this is the major culture shift between the ECan of old and the ECan of now, it wasn’t scary. It was collaborative.

Their expectations around the environment have been made clear, companies like Ballance and Ravensdown have invested in technology to ensure I have accurate records on hand, the water meters ECan told me to install 8 years ago at my own cost are another small piece in a much larger puzzle that is just starting to make sense to me now.

Every farm in the Ecan catchment, be they dairy, drystock or arable, will now have new consents to farm based on many factors including their nutrient inputs and losses. Every year their nutrient budgets will updated and reviewed against their consents to ensure compliance, and each farm will be regularly audited to see how they stack up against a range of criteria.

There’s no doubt that some of the tools being used aren’t perfect, but these are things that can be improved and tweaked over time.

At a time when people are not shy at pointing the finger and asking “why should you be allowed to farm?” I’m very glad to be farming in an area that allows me to be reply  “this is where I am now, and this is how I’m going to improve”


No comments:

Post a Comment